The Stacey Matrix is a decision-making and management framework created by Ralph D. Stacey. It helps leaders determine the most appropriate approach to managing situations based on two dimensions:
Dimensions of the Stacey Matrix:
Degree of Certainty (X-axis) – How certain are we about what will happen?
Level of Agreement (Y-axis) – How much agreement is there about what should be done?
Using these axes, the matrix categorizes problems into four key zones:
1. Simple / Close to Certainty and Agreement
High certainty and high agreement
Cause-and-effect relationships are clear.
Best handled with standard operating procedures, best practices, or project management.
Example: Routine tasks like payroll processing.
2. Complicated
High certainty but low agreement, or vice versa.
Requires analysis, expert judgment, and planning.
Best managed with traditional project management, engineering, or consultation.
Example: Building a bridge, where the process is known but many expert opinions exist.
3. Complex
Low certainty and low agreement
No clear answers upfront; outcomes emerge through experimentation and interaction.
Best addressed with Agile, Scrum, iterative approaches, or design thinking.
Example: Product development in a rapidly changing market.
4. Chaotic
Very low certainty and no agreement
No clear cause-and-effect relationships.
Requires immediate action to restore order before applying other methods.
Best approached with crisis management, intuition, and rapid response.
Example: Natural disasters or emergencies.
Summary Table:
Zone
Certainty
Agreement
Approach
Simple
High
High
Best practices, SOPs
Complicated
High
Low
Expert analysis, planning
Complex
Low
Low
Agile, iteration, discovery
Chaotic
Very Low
Very Low
Act quickly, stabilize
The Stacey Matrix is a decision-making and management framework created by Ralph D. Stacey. It helps leaders determine the most appropriate approach to managing situations based on two dimensions:
Dimensions of the Stacey Matrix:
Degree of Certainty (X-axis) – How certain are we about what will happen?
Level of Agreement (Y-axis) – How much agreement is there about what should be done?
Using these axes, the matrix categorizes problems into four key zones:
1. Simple / Close to Certainty and Agreement
High certainty and high agreement
Cause-and-effect relationships are clear.
Best handled with standard operating procedures, best practices, or project management.
Example: Routine tasks like payroll processing.
2. Complicated
High certainty but low agreement, or vice versa.
Requires analysis, expert judgment, and planning.
Best managed with traditional project management, engineering, or consultation.
Example: Building a bridge, where the process is known but many expert opinions exist.
3. Complex
Low certainty and low agreement
No clear answers upfront; outcomes emerge through experimentation and interaction.
Best addressed with Agile, Scrum, iterative approaches, or design thinking.
Example: Product development in a rapidly changing market.
4. Chaotic
Very low certainty and no agreement
No clear cause-and-effect relationships.
Requires immediate action to restore order before applying other methods.
Best approached with crisis management, intuition, and rapid response.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok